kevin barnett

Archive for January, 2007

« view previous entries

wd~50

My father treated a group of us at wd~50, a restaurant in the lower East of Manhattan. I chose the restaurant from Adam Platt’s Where To Eat In 2007 feature in New York Magazine. That led to me discovering Wylie Dufresne and his notoriety on the culinary scene.

Appropriately, the next evening during the finale of Bravo’s Top Chef, Wylie Dufresne shows up as a judge. I had been loosely following the season but knew of one contestant’s (Marcel) fan-boy admiration for Dufresne’s skills in molecular gastronomy. Anthony Bourdain wrote a classic commentary on the contestants in which he describes Marcel as “is there anything this guy won’t foam” and “he’s no Wylie Dufresne“.

I agree with the general consensus that Marcel was a chump and was happy to see New York’s Ilan Hall take the prize. The irony couldn’t be much sweeter than Marcel’s final dinner failing while trying a gastro-trick of encapsulating vinaigrette inside a bubble of sodium alginate for a salad — clearly designed to impress Dufresne.  But at the end of the day, Marcel served up a salad which is, as the judges remarked, amateur hour.  Apparently paprika and saffron is enough to win.

Enough on that tangent.

While studying the wd~50 menu, I had decided early on that I would be ordering one of Dufresne’s signature dishes: pickled beef tongue. It’s not my first time eating lengua as anyone who has ventured into a dive-taqueria with me (wait, is there a such thing as a non-dive taqueria?) knows. But pickled beef tongue? Absolutely. And paired with the strange cubes of fried mayonaise and crumbles of onion marmalade, it was an absolute hit. The tongue itself was shaved ultra thin and served much like an antipasta course.

The clear winner for the first course was not the tongue, however. Two others at our table ordered an appetizer consisting of pinenuts with smoked octopus and rabbit sausage. It tastes like none of those ingredients yet all of them at the same time. It’s a divine culinary experience that could only come from a mad scientist like Dufresne.

I followed my tongue appetizer with belly — pork belly. I had never had pork belly before and I can’t wait to have it again. It is everything there is to love about bacon but in a piece of pork. The portion was spot on so the richness was not overpowering, especially paired with the root vegetables.

Finally, the desserts were some of the more original platings and presentations I have experienced in a restaurant. My order can be best described as a chocolate ganoush ribbon stretched across the right 1/4 of the plate with puddles of avocado foam, chocolate cookie crumbs and licorish intersecting and orbiting. I was too mezmorized with the design to even concern myself with what the others at our table were eating. Also as a special treat, the server brought a small passion fruit sorbet cake with a lit candle. The servers failed to sing happy birthday, however.

wd~50 turned out to be everything I was looking for; a unique culinary experience with great food that I would never prepare for myself or anyone else in a million years. This is my favorite restaurant in New York.

I was just listening to The Arcade Fire - Neon Bible

Posted in Cuisine, New York, TV

January 31st, 2007 | 2:15 AM

It’s Cold But Still Not Inuit Cold

On the coldest night/day of the New York winter season, I watched an episode of Nova documenting the navigation of the Northern Passage by Roald Amundsen. Amundsen was a great explorer from Norway, who after becoming the first to successfully navigate the Northern Passage, went on to become the first human to reach the South Pole on December 14, 1911.

Amundsen credits his success to the knowledge he learned from his Northern Passage sail. During a winter layover on King William Island in which their ship was forced to be frozen in for several months, Amundsen met people from a nearby Inuit settlement. The documentary explores this fascinating exchange between Amundsen and the Inuits in which he learns their methods for surving in the arctic tundra.

A group of Netsilik Inuit inside their snow-block constructed igloo. Photo: PBS

The trick is Caribou fur. Clearly by no “accident”, the Inuits chose Caribou as their primary source for clothing because of the nature of the fur itself. The hair fibers are hollow so they are able to trap warm air while still remaining breathable. This allows the person wearing the furs to be quite active outside in sub-freezing temperatures, to stay warm and to remove the sweat from their bodies.

Similar to the air-trapping properties of Caribou fir, Inuits learned that building a shelter using blocks of packed snow (not ice) would provide enough insulation from the cold temperatures. I think to anyone accustomed to sleeping in any where outside the Arctic would have a hard time adjusting to the room-temperature of an igloo but clearly the construction is capable of survival - just enough to get by.

Other important skills Amundsen learned included glazing the dog sled rails with ice so that the sled could stay on top of the snow and to sleep naked, again with the caribou furs to keep warm at night. note: I knew about the sleeping naked technique before watching this documentary.

My grandmother’s family immigrated here from Norway so I feel that I should have been more informed on the adventures of Roald Amundsen. Clearly, I have some catching up to do. More interesting to me, though was the life of an Inuit: cut off from the progress of the modern world (this is changing), completely accepting of their environment and focused on nothing more than survival and community.

Nunavut, the Canadian territory which includes the islands and land masses on which many Inuit live, has an average temperature of 5°F in July and -25°F in January. Meanwhile, New Yorkers are suffering for at least one more day in the current single-digit wind chill.

I was just listening to The Good, The Bad and The Queen - Northern Whale

Posted in New York, TV

January 26th, 2007 | 5:45 PM

Colbert vs. Papa Bear

Stephen Colbert billed it as “The biggest crossover in television since The Flintstones met The Jetsons”. Tonight, Bill O’Reilly had Colbert on The Factor and O’Reilly filled the guest spot on The Colbert Report. As a fan of Colbert and while not a fan per-se, respecting O’Reilly’s impact on the cable news scene - I thought tonight’s shows would be historical.

And they were. They just weren’t that good. Colbert first did the interview on O’Reilly’s show which I think ended up being the better of the two. Colbert tried to stay on top of his character but O’Reilly wanted to focus on the French pronunciation of his last name and Jon Stewart. As such, he got nailed. Colbert did return the nail by pointing out the average age of The Factor which I believe is over 70.

O’Reilly’s segment on The Colbert Report might have been better if some asshole hadn’t boo’ed him during his entrance. Not only was it lacking in class, it gave O’Reilly an excuse to be…an asshole (himself?). And in typical O’Reilly form, he tries to be funny, fails miserably and creates uncomfortable tension. That tension was broken by two funny moments involving a 30% off sticker on his book and a photoshop’ed photo of O’Reilly as a gay male dancer.

I was confident that Colbert would nail O’Reilly in his expert use of irony - Stephen Colbert managed to nail George W. Bush in the same manner during the White House Correspondents dinner. And whatever the right-wing bloggers want to say about Colbert’s keynote, it was definitely a hilarious and ballsy nailing. Perhaps that’s why this year’s has-been ever-was keynote speaker has been asked to “take it easy” on The President.

Posted in Politics, TV, YouTube

January 19th, 2007 | 1:34 AM

The Trailer for Sunshine

It appears that Fox Searchlight has come full circle in terms of what it has learned from viral marketing and the success of YouTube and Myspace. Sunshine, a sci-fi directed by the brilliant Danny Boyle had it’s first teaser trailer leaked yesterday. Perhaps the leak was intentional. Either way, the studio has decided to capitalize on the leak offering a YouTube-ish embed code for fans to post the trailer on their own website. Because I am a fan of Danny Boyle and sci-fi movies in general, I felt I should oblige.

Also, note the use of Clint Mansell’s Lux Aeterna from Requiem For a Dream. Apparently, Clint was not given the heads up on the song’s use for the LOTR: The Two Towers until a couple of days before it’s release. I sent him a note asking him if he was extended that courtesy for this trailer which definitely adds to the epic-ness of it all. Great work demands respect.

Posted in Film, Music

January 17th, 2007 | 4:48 PM

Web Designers On Drugs

I love nature films…

Posted in Random, YouTube

January 12th, 2007 | 4:49 PM

SLVR: Old and Busted. iPhone: New Hotness.

After having digested Steve Jobs’ keynote on the iPhone as well as the Quicktime demos on Apple.com, I have some impressive geek envy. The iPhone definitely exceeded my expectations in terms of the features, design and more than anything else - the UI.

But I have some questions…

Sensory Response

One of the great things about a physical interface like a keyboard or keypad is touch response - when you press a button, you can feel it depress. This is actually one of things I love most about my SLVR and the modern 4-letter coded Motorola phones: the etched steel keyboards feel good to the touch.

You have to assume that this is lost on any touch screen display. There will be no touch response since you will be tapping on a coated smooth surface. So what will the sensory response on the iPhone be? I can only assume there will be an audio response (i.e. the iPod ‘click’ sound) because having no sensory response in a UI is bad UI.

Battery Life

This has to be worst feature of the device: 5 hours of doing anything but listening to music, in which case the battery life is 16 hours. Does this mean you have to treat the device like a laptop or an UMPCwhatever — unplugged for a few hours but otherwise, connected to a power outlet?

But What About .Mac?

Jobs strolled the Google and Yahoo! CEOs out while demonstrating the compatibility with Gmail, Yahoo Mail, etc. I was shocked that he did not mention .Mac email, iSync, etc. once. Does this mean that .Mac is going away and will play no part in iPhone’s capabilities? I think Leopard can only answer that question.

Personally, I wish Apple would outsource .Mac to someone more capable. I know for a fact that the .Mac development team consists of 2-4 people. Compared to Yahoo! and Google’s behemoth development teams, there is just no way they can keep up with Gmail, Yahoo Mail, Flickr, etc.

Hint: I’m dropping .Mac this year unless it does something really fancy with Leopard that I can’t live without.

Just How Exclusive Is Exclusive?

I am a Cingular customer, having been grandfathered in from 5+ years of service with AT&T Wireless. Ironic that after the AT&T/SBC supermerger, Cingular will inevitably become AT&T Wireless — the company they acquired 2-3 years ago. And so it seems that I will have some exclusivity to the use of the iPhone as a Cingular customer.

The question is, not so much for me but most everyone else I know, how long will that exclusive contract last with Cingular. Cingular often times gets the first run with the new hotness of the year (remember the RAZR?) but eventually the device finds its way to other carriers as its popularity increases. There is no doubt that this device will be popular so how long before my T-Mobile, Sprint and Verizon friends can join in the fun?

And while we’re on the subject, I’d love to know what Cingular had to do to land that exclusive contract.

Should I Wait For the iPhone nano?

I’ve been a proud owner if an iPod nano for over a year and I wouldn’t trade it for an iPod (video). I love the smaller form factor, the resilience of the newer aluminum nanos and the fact that it has no moving parts. In a sense, it’s an iPod lite.

While dreaming of what the iPhone would be before today, I envisioned a device with typical iPod and very limited mobile phone features: making phone calls and sending text messages. I assumed that Apple would use their clickwheel interface and bypass the need for a keypad by using the same search interface found on an iPod. Obviously this would rely heavily on the need to sync your phone numbers off of your computer but I believe in that solution anyway. I also assumed that Apple might have a leg up on current voice recognition technology which flat out sucks but might be enough to recognize numbers.

Even after seeing the realized iPhone, I still feel there is a space for a simple music/Phone device that does these three things: plays music (like an iPod), send/receive phone calls and send/receive text messages. And nothing more.

I would bet they’re working on such a device. Let’s face it, not all of need our iPods to play video as much as we need our phones to be “smart”. Well, in the case of the iPhone, we may not need it to be that “genius”. And it would certainly extend the battery life.

OS X on the iPhone: Open or Closed Platform?

Most “smartphones” run Palm OS or Windows Mobile which allows developers to create applications to run on those devices. There are plenty of useful applications out there which due to the small audience for each app, doesn’t make sense for the platform/hardware companies to make.

The iPod is not an open platform. Only Apple decides what does/does not happen on the iPod. My fear is that this will be the case for the iPhone. I supposed Apple keeping it closed helps keep a consistent user experience. However, the “widgets” available (Weather, Stock Prices, etc.) are all open for development on OS X and will make the iPhone even more attractive if it allows user-installed widgets.

OK, Blah Blah. Are You Going To Get an iPhone?

Absolutely. The 8GB model, too. iPod nano, consider yourself on notice.

*update: I was so damn excited about the iPhone, I forgot I own a SLVR and not a RAZR.

I was just listening to Cicada - Rollerball

Posted in Technology

January 9th, 2007 | 4:35 PM